This is a perfect video that demonstrates how frustrating it is for conservatives to deal with liberals. Even when you go out of your way to present them with sound logic, they stammer and simply repeat what they've been told to say. It's the total brain washing of our society.
Watch how these liberal students cannot articulate their positions but, simply reply that "it's not the same." Well, what's not the same? What do they mean some people only have so many opportunities? What about the kids who don't have to work while they are going to college? Or what about the kids that are able to get better equipment like laptops, calculators, more study guides, etc. Aren't those students at an advantage and should spread their GPA around? Why doesn't the same logic apply for taxes?
Of course people who can think for themselves can see the direct correlation here.
I love the argument about GPA not equaling money. Well, if that's the case, what does it matter if you share your GPA with everyone? Either GPA is more important or less important and if it's less important than money, certainly these students shouldn't be complaining about spreading their good fortune. If it's more important, than they definitely should be spreading their GPAs to less advantaged students. Practice what you preach, liberals.
Showing posts with label logic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label logic. Show all posts
2010-02-05
People That Believe In G-d Are Scary
Or, so I've just been told!
Another liberal attacking Sarah Parlin because, she "believes in an invisible god."
I'm so addicted to Facebook! I get to meet and see all sorts of different people express the most absurd views.
This older Savage diatribe was posted and of course, being a huge Savage fan, I "liked" the post and made a comment to the effect that I agree with Savage.
Of course, in walks a liberal I have dealt with in the past. I guess after much time has passed, he feels as though he can beat me in an argument now. He basically said Sarah Palin was ignorant and it's not at all unreasonable for Matt Damon to express his concern. The exact quote:
In return, I asked him, point blank, what ignorance he was referring to? I reminded him that she was the governor of the state of Alaska and, that the person he voted for in the White House had practically NO experience doing anything other than organizing a few BBQ's.
His response?
You're seriously defending Sarah Palin? Besides, this wasn't a competition of who is more qualified. Strictly a assesment of Palin's scariness. You would vote for her? You've gotta just be playing devil's advocate or something. C'mon.
Do you notice how he has now changed his original point? First, she was ignorant. Now, it's not about ignorance at all, it's all about being scary.
My response:
Yes, I like Sarah Palin. I'm not much of a "woman in politics" sort of person. I happen to find a great deal of wisdom in women NOT being in politics because, I find many of them vote strictly on how good a candidate looks. Especially amongst liberal women. Most of them haven't a clue as to what their candidate supports; they lack any knowledge of the issues and when you question them, they say, "I just can't talk about this with you!"
*eyeroll*
I do like Sarah Palin. I think she would have done a great job as vice president and, judging her by an interview that was cut up worse than a Freddy Kruger victim, is hardly a way to judge her and say she is "scary." How is she scary?
Why wouldn't I defend her? What's your point?
So, at this point, I'm waiting to hear what it is that he finds so scary about Sarah Palin that wasn't scary about Barack Obama. I mean, his name alone is enough to give one concern, his ties to terrorists, communism, being a puppet for the far-left in this country, ect. No, none of THOSE things scared him but, Sarah Palin did?
Here's his highly thought out, quite telling response:
She clearly didn't have a grasp on reality. We didn't need another un-informed god freak who thinks an invisible man is telling her what to do near the white house. I mean you did watch her interviews right? You wouldn't defend her because she is a muppet, you're clearly more itelligent than she and I'm not sure why you'd want her as a reprasentative or person in charge. Or you're so wound up in your conservatism you can't make clear judgements.
Now, I could be rude and point out that the words are: puppet, intelligent, representative, and judgments respectively but, I'll ignore that because, it truly is trite.
If you notice, I had already addressed the interviews in my previous post and how they were butchered in a biased way. I brought the interviews up immediately because, this is a TALKING point with liberals. This is what they get in their emails from Barber Boxer or, Nancy Pelosi or, some other left wing nut sending out bullet points for democraps to talk about.
He was so eager to bring up the interviews, that he didn't even read my previous post. So, his answer was given to me in a round about way. He thinks she's scary because she is a "god freak."
Let me just say, for a group of people who claim to be so tolerant, so accepting, so politically correct, they bow down to anyone that is a minority, they kiss ass with anyone that says they are a part of sexual deviant group, fine...but, wow do they show their utter nastiness when it comes to G-d.
I, personally, have such a hard time hearing the words, "G-d d---," and "J---- C-----!" I cringe. I, also, if you notice do not even spell G-d's name out to show my respect for Him. This is not something I have to do. This is a choice I have made and I realize that not everyone does that; it doesn't bother me terribly when people spell His name out but, when people do not capitalize the word G-d, when referring to one True G-d, AND they are liberal and a part of the "PC movement" I DO get upset. Why am I, as a Christian in training, not afforded the same "sensitivity"?
At the same time, I do get over this easily, because, I am not into PC crap. I just find it annoying how selective these folks are and, they flat out refuse to recognize this.
So, I simply pointed out that there is nothing wrong with a belief in G-d. I had to repeat that the interviews with Palin were chopped up and biased.
Bottom line, his point:
Other than, any political opinion you've ever said is really a moot point. Because you would base your vote only if he/she subscribes to the same invisible space god as you do.
Too bad. We need less god.
This type of response just floors me.
Then, of course, he does what every atheist does:
So the bible is perfect and so you live by it?
Let's attack the Bible because, you know, it was written by man. This is such an odd argument to me. I go by the KJV and yes, there are some flaws but, it's perfect in it's own right. The Bible was written in a way that it's translations were reviewed several times and scrutinized, a truly democratic way of translating the words. So, yes, I trust the Bible and, see it's wisdom.
The liberal however will spend about two-thirds of their argument attacking the Bible, saying it's stupid to believe in a book (that ironically has been protected all these years...I mean, what other books have survived that long?), that it was written by man so, it's just a flawed book and filled with out-dated ideas, ect. We've all heard these arguments before but, then, these same people want to put their whole lives from cradle-to-the grave in the hands of a government, ran by man???? I just don't get it at all.
You can't have it both ways. Christians admit that the Bible has flaws to a degree. It is perfect in it's own right.We know man is flawed; that is exactly why we trust ourselves to make the best decisions for our lives. We also trust that others can make their own decisions for their lives. When you have the government making all your decision, that is not freedom and, you are putting your trust in another flawed man.
At least, most the atheists I know are actually conservative or, libertarian. That is at least consistent with their beliefs.
Yet, to this man, Christian conservatives are scary and, "don't have a grasp on reality."
Another liberal attacking Sarah Parlin because, she "believes in an invisible god."
I'm so addicted to Facebook! I get to meet and see all sorts of different people express the most absurd views.
This older Savage diatribe was posted and of course, being a huge Savage fan, I "liked" the post and made a comment to the effect that I agree with Savage.
Of course, in walks a liberal I have dealt with in the past. I guess after much time has passed, he feels as though he can beat me in an argument now. He basically said Sarah Palin was ignorant and it's not at all unreasonable for Matt Damon to express his concern. The exact quote:
Damon is jealous of Sarah Palin? Huh? No, he's scared of her ignorance and how close she became to the white house. Sounds pretty simple and doesn't need pyscho analysis.
In return, I asked him, point blank, what ignorance he was referring to? I reminded him that she was the governor of the state of Alaska and, that the person he voted for in the White House had practically NO experience doing anything other than organizing a few BBQ's.
His response?
You're seriously defending Sarah Palin? Besides, this wasn't a competition of who is more qualified. Strictly a assesment of Palin's scariness. You would vote for her? You've gotta just be playing devil's advocate or something. C'mon.
Do you notice how he has now changed his original point? First, she was ignorant. Now, it's not about ignorance at all, it's all about being scary.
My response:
Yes, I like Sarah Palin. I'm not much of a "woman in politics" sort of person. I happen to find a great deal of wisdom in women NOT being in politics because, I find many of them vote strictly on how good a candidate looks. Especially amongst liberal women. Most of them haven't a clue as to what their candidate supports; they lack any knowledge of the issues and when you question them, they say, "I just can't talk about this with you!"
*eyeroll*
I do like Sarah Palin. I think she would have done a great job as vice president and, judging her by an interview that was cut up worse than a Freddy Kruger victim, is hardly a way to judge her and say she is "scary." How is she scary?
Why wouldn't I defend her? What's your point?
So, at this point, I'm waiting to hear what it is that he finds so scary about Sarah Palin that wasn't scary about Barack Obama. I mean, his name alone is enough to give one concern, his ties to terrorists, communism, being a puppet for the far-left in this country, ect. No, none of THOSE things scared him but, Sarah Palin did?
Here's his highly thought out, quite telling response:
She clearly didn't have a grasp on reality. We didn't need another un-informed god freak who thinks an invisible man is telling her what to do near the white house. I mean you did watch her interviews right? You wouldn't defend her because she is a muppet, you're clearly more itelligent than she and I'm not sure why you'd want her as a reprasentative or person in charge. Or you're so wound up in your conservatism you can't make clear judgements.
Now, I could be rude and point out that the words are: puppet, intelligent, representative, and judgments respectively but, I'll ignore that because, it truly is trite.
If you notice, I had already addressed the interviews in my previous post and how they were butchered in a biased way. I brought the interviews up immediately because, this is a TALKING point with liberals. This is what they get in their emails from Barber Boxer or, Nancy Pelosi or, some other left wing nut sending out bullet points for democraps to talk about.
He was so eager to bring up the interviews, that he didn't even read my previous post. So, his answer was given to me in a round about way. He thinks she's scary because she is a "god freak."
Let me just say, for a group of people who claim to be so tolerant, so accepting, so politically correct, they bow down to anyone that is a minority, they kiss ass with anyone that says they are a part of sexual deviant group, fine...but, wow do they show their utter nastiness when it comes to G-d.
I, personally, have such a hard time hearing the words, "G-d d---," and "J---- C-----!" I cringe. I, also, if you notice do not even spell G-d's name out to show my respect for Him. This is not something I have to do. This is a choice I have made and I realize that not everyone does that; it doesn't bother me terribly when people spell His name out but, when people do not capitalize the word G-d, when referring to one True G-d, AND they are liberal and a part of the "PC movement" I DO get upset. Why am I, as a Christian in training, not afforded the same "sensitivity"?
At the same time, I do get over this easily, because, I am not into PC crap. I just find it annoying how selective these folks are and, they flat out refuse to recognize this.
So, I simply pointed out that there is nothing wrong with a belief in G-d. I had to repeat that the interviews with Palin were chopped up and biased.
Bottom line, his point:
Other than, any political opinion you've ever said is really a moot point. Because you would base your vote only if he/she subscribes to the same invisible space god as you do.
Too bad. We need less god.
This type of response just floors me.
Then, of course, he does what every atheist does:
So the bible is perfect and so you live by it?
Let's attack the Bible because, you know, it was written by man. This is such an odd argument to me. I go by the KJV and yes, there are some flaws but, it's perfect in it's own right. The Bible was written in a way that it's translations were reviewed several times and scrutinized, a truly democratic way of translating the words. So, yes, I trust the Bible and, see it's wisdom.
The liberal however will spend about two-thirds of their argument attacking the Bible, saying it's stupid to believe in a book (that ironically has been protected all these years...I mean, what other books have survived that long?), that it was written by man so, it's just a flawed book and filled with out-dated ideas, ect. We've all heard these arguments before but, then, these same people want to put their whole lives from cradle-to-the grave in the hands of a government, ran by man???? I just don't get it at all.
You can't have it both ways. Christians admit that the Bible has flaws to a degree. It is perfect in it's own right.We know man is flawed; that is exactly why we trust ourselves to make the best decisions for our lives. We also trust that others can make their own decisions for their lives. When you have the government making all your decision, that is not freedom and, you are putting your trust in another flawed man.
At least, most the atheists I know are actually conservative or, libertarian. That is at least consistent with their beliefs.
Yet, to this man, Christian conservatives are scary and, "don't have a grasp on reality."
2009-11-01
Moore Logic
In my quest for exposing Michael Moore to be the fool he truly is, I figured it would be best to go right to the dirt bag's website myself and read the inane junk he posts on his site. You can get there by going to michaelmoore.com.
In an article entitled, "Michael Moore's Action Plan: 15 Things Every American Can Do Right Now" you will find the most absurd, zero-sum ideas this man has thought of. You can click the title to be taken directly to the article.
Now, don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with contacting your representative, calling the White House, doing community work, ect. I think all of that is completely acceptable. However, the things he wants people to demand are laughable, and the meaning behind such things are utterly ludicrous, minus inference.
Let me give some examples. I just love examples!
Moore says, "Declare a moratorium on all home evictions. Not one more family should be thrown out of their home. The banks must adjust their monthly mortgage payments to be in line with what people's homes are now truly worth -- and what they can afford. Also, it must be stated by law: If you lose your job, you cannot be tossed out of your home."
Is he kidding? Does he have any idea how foolish this is? Look, I don't think anyone wants to see people get kicked out of their homes but, I'll be damned if the rest of us have to pay for what someone can't afford. This is what happens when you can't afford something, a house that a person shouldn't have bought in the first place. We can't be babysitting people and telling them what they can and cannot do, people have the choice to purchase what they want to but, with that choice comes responsibility! THEIR responsibility, not everyone else. Most banks do work with people. They don't want to throw people out either but, they have to get paid as well.
If you lose your job, you can't be tossed out of your home? You should be allowed to stay for free? Not pay? What if you got fired? What if you pissed in your boss's coffee and got fired? Why not everyone just go out and get fired so they don't have to work and then, they will be guaranteed not being thrown out of their home? Sure, it's different when some people lose their jobs because of lay offs or, maybe you were unjustly fired, (I sure have been!), and it sucks! I never expected someone else to guarantee me a place to live. I had to rely on my friends and family for help.
I don't even mind someone getting food stamps or unemployment. Sometimes, you have to ask for help. I get that. I'm just saying that if his plan were actually enacted, you would see immense abuse.
Moore then goes on to say, "Congress must join the civilized world and expand Medicare For All Americans. A single, nonprofit source must run a universal health care system that covers everyone. Medical bills are now the #1 cause of bankruptcies and evictions in this country. Medicare For All will end this misery. The bill to make this happen is H.R. 3200 -- but this bill is worthless without the amendment from Rep. Anthony Weiner that will bring us closer to the real bill that should be passed: H.R. 676."
Okay, I can understand maybe expanding some of Medicare, however, this "single, nonprofit source," is a genuine feeble-mindedness. Nonprofit? Is he out of his mind or, just an evil scum that is taking full advantage of an ignorant population? How can anyone believe that a profit would not be made? There are so many things wrong with this statement, I am not sure where to begin.
Does he presume that doctors and nurses will work for free? How will they get paid if no profit is coming in? Does he believe the government officials will not line their pockets with money, if the government takes over health care? How naive can one person be? This is my whole point whenever I think of liberal "logic," either they are just so ignorant of reality or, they are completely evil people, knowing full well what liars they are, telling people anything and everything to gain power.
How can anyone think that health care would be a good thing if it were nonprofit? There are just somethings that I can't believe anyone has to actually argue the other side. It's prodigious!
I'd like to know where he gets this statistic of the number one reason people go into bankruptcies and get evicted are medical bills. I don't think so. I noticed he didn't site any source for this information. We are just supposed to believe him because, "he says so!" What a pompous ass.
There's plenty more he says in the article. Somethings are okay. Again, I can agree with getting involved, running for office, writing emails or letter, ect. It's just the things he supports dumbfound me.
With health care on the front burner, we are going to be hearing more and more from Moore and I am determined to expose him for what he is, an unqualified, hoodwinking, guile hoaxer.
In an article entitled, "Michael Moore's Action Plan: 15 Things Every American Can Do Right Now" you will find the most absurd, zero-sum ideas this man has thought of. You can click the title to be taken directly to the article.
Now, don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with contacting your representative, calling the White House, doing community work, ect. I think all of that is completely acceptable. However, the things he wants people to demand are laughable, and the meaning behind such things are utterly ludicrous, minus inference.
Let me give some examples. I just love examples!
Moore says, "Declare a moratorium on all home evictions. Not one more family should be thrown out of their home. The banks must adjust their monthly mortgage payments to be in line with what people's homes are now truly worth -- and what they can afford. Also, it must be stated by law: If you lose your job, you cannot be tossed out of your home."
Is he kidding? Does he have any idea how foolish this is? Look, I don't think anyone wants to see people get kicked out of their homes but, I'll be damned if the rest of us have to pay for what someone can't afford. This is what happens when you can't afford something, a house that a person shouldn't have bought in the first place. We can't be babysitting people and telling them what they can and cannot do, people have the choice to purchase what they want to but, with that choice comes responsibility! THEIR responsibility, not everyone else. Most banks do work with people. They don't want to throw people out either but, they have to get paid as well.
If you lose your job, you can't be tossed out of your home? You should be allowed to stay for free? Not pay? What if you got fired? What if you pissed in your boss's coffee and got fired? Why not everyone just go out and get fired so they don't have to work and then, they will be guaranteed not being thrown out of their home? Sure, it's different when some people lose their jobs because of lay offs or, maybe you were unjustly fired, (I sure have been!), and it sucks! I never expected someone else to guarantee me a place to live. I had to rely on my friends and family for help.
I don't even mind someone getting food stamps or unemployment. Sometimes, you have to ask for help. I get that. I'm just saying that if his plan were actually enacted, you would see immense abuse.
Moore then goes on to say, "Congress must join the civilized world and expand Medicare For All Americans. A single, nonprofit source must run a universal health care system that covers everyone. Medical bills are now the #1 cause of bankruptcies and evictions in this country. Medicare For All will end this misery. The bill to make this happen is H.R. 3200 -- but this bill is worthless without the amendment from Rep. Anthony Weiner that will bring us closer to the real bill that should be passed: H.R. 676."
Okay, I can understand maybe expanding some of Medicare, however, this "single, nonprofit source," is a genuine feeble-mindedness. Nonprofit? Is he out of his mind or, just an evil scum that is taking full advantage of an ignorant population? How can anyone believe that a profit would not be made? There are so many things wrong with this statement, I am not sure where to begin.
Does he presume that doctors and nurses will work for free? How will they get paid if no profit is coming in? Does he believe the government officials will not line their pockets with money, if the government takes over health care? How naive can one person be? This is my whole point whenever I think of liberal "logic," either they are just so ignorant of reality or, they are completely evil people, knowing full well what liars they are, telling people anything and everything to gain power.
How can anyone think that health care would be a good thing if it were nonprofit? There are just somethings that I can't believe anyone has to actually argue the other side. It's prodigious!
I'd like to know where he gets this statistic of the number one reason people go into bankruptcies and get evicted are medical bills. I don't think so. I noticed he didn't site any source for this information. We are just supposed to believe him because, "he says so!" What a pompous ass.
There's plenty more he says in the article. Somethings are okay. Again, I can agree with getting involved, running for office, writing emails or letter, ect. It's just the things he supports dumbfound me.
With health care on the front burner, we are going to be hearing more and more from Moore and I am determined to expose him for what he is, an unqualified, hoodwinking, guile hoaxer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)