In this episode, I discuss the final debate between Hillary and Trump. Enjoy. Share.
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label debate. Show all posts
2016-10-24
2016-07-01
The 64 Year Switch? Liberals and Their Silly Stories
So the past 24 hours or so I've found myself in a debate on Facebook with a couple of delusional ignorant liberals. Of course, things got heated and I should have known beforehand I was wasting my time, so I have no one to blame but myself. I have had dealings with their idiocy before on other topics. I'm convinced that far-left "liberalism" is a cancer, not that I didn't know this already.
It began last week when I celebrated the British and their Brexit vote. To me, this was quite a victory for our famous ally and to my shock, a pair of liberal Americans (from a debate group), did not share my enthusiasm. One of them began to pout and turned into a gloomy-Gary (yes, I'm making that a name now like "negative Nancy"). His only concern was his money. Now mind you, the British government had already laid out plans for the possibility of an exit and had announced that the initial first days would be volatile but eventually they would level out. I didn't even bother pointing this out to him because I was on the other end of my computer laughing hysterically since this man, an American mind you, all of a sudden wanted us to believe he was an expert in the market.
It began last week when I celebrated the British and their Brexit vote. To me, this was quite a victory for our famous ally and to my shock, a pair of liberal Americans (from a debate group), did not share my enthusiasm. One of them began to pout and turned into a gloomy-Gary (yes, I'm making that a name now like "negative Nancy"). His only concern was his money. Now mind you, the British government had already laid out plans for the possibility of an exit and had announced that the initial first days would be volatile but eventually they would level out. I didn't even bother pointing this out to him because I was on the other end of my computer laughing hysterically since this man, an American mind you, all of a sudden wanted us to believe he was an expert in the market.
2015-05-02
A Look Back - William F. Buckley vs. Hugh Hefner
A debate in 1966 between Buckley and Hefner discussing the "Playboy philosophy" turns out to be quite intriguing.
Buckley does his best toward the end of the interview by pointing out the seemingly contradictory way in which Hefner instructs his bunnies to refrain from sexual relations with patrons and what Hefner advocates in general as it pertains to sexuality or sexual behavior.
What are your thoughts as you watch this debate and compare with the current world we live in? How much has changed? What do you feel has been positive vs. negative?
Buckley does his best toward the end of the interview by pointing out the seemingly contradictory way in which Hefner instructs his bunnies to refrain from sexual relations with patrons and what Hefner advocates in general as it pertains to sexuality or sexual behavior.
What are your thoughts as you watch this debate and compare with the current world we live in? How much has changed? What do you feel has been positive vs. negative?
2014-07-29
Dershowitz vs. Chomsky
In 2012 a debate took place at Harvard between Alan Dershowitz and Noam Chompsky; the topic was Israel.
Considering the current situation in the Middle East, I am posting this debate for those that have not seen it before or those who would like to see it again.
Considering the current situation in the Middle East, I am posting this debate for those that have not seen it before or those who would like to see it again.
2014-01-08
Marijuana -- The Main Issues I Have With the General Debate
*Some links have been added. As I gain more information I will try and update here.
Well, it is now legal for citizens in Colorado to toke up and smoke some marijuana for recreational purposes. I'm not exactly sure what to think of this news. It will be very interesting to see how it all plays out for them and the rest of the country will certainly be watching. In fact, I'm fairly certain that many states will be eager to follow their lead.
The Debate
2013-10-09
Healthcare, Government Shutdown, Winning?
CNN
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius appeared on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and was unable to directly answer why it was big businesses were given the opportunity to delay their compliance with the new affordable health care act, while individuals were not being afforded the same option.
After pressing her further on the issue to no avail, a somewhat exasperated Stewart finally smiled and asked, “Am I a stupid man?”
2012-10-23
Final Debate
Tonight was the final debate and it was all about foreign policy. From Obama we learned that we no longer have to worry about Russia and he has established stability throughout the word. Amazing. So I guess we are back to ignoring Libya and Egypt again?
Is this guy serious? I'm not sure how one can honestly follow what has been going on the past four years and not realize what a liar this man is.
As usual, Obama could not control himself. He was dismissive, condescending, and rude. The man cannot control his behavior for 90 minutes. Again, those of us that have watched him deal with the press know full well what an angry man he is but, hopefully it is more apparent to those that have done nothing but praise him for basically doing nothing the last four years.
He still has no plan and as far as balancing a budget. How does he plan on doing this, with another executive order? He hasn't been able to pass a budget the past three years. What makes him think this will change over the next four years? Even if he needs the majority of 60 votes to enact the budget, it still doesn't change the fact that none of the democrats will vote for his budget. Unlike Romney, he has not been willing to work with others. Just like his demeanor reveals, he is a child in an adult body playing president. I'm surprised he didn't just throw himself on the floor and begin to scream, while banging his feet and fists on the ground.
(The video will not allow me to embed it here, even though it does offer a code). You will have to click here to see the video for yourself.
After the debate, libs were all over the "Bayonette" comment as if it were some kind of amazing observation but it looks like the pie is on their faces now! Shhh...don't tell a liberal they are wrong, you'll be instantly called a racist.
Obama also insists that he never went on an "apology tour" as Romney pointed out. He went so far as to suggest that all those "fact check" sites confirm this for him. It's nice to know that Obama has to double check with websites devoted to his re-election in order to confirm what he did or didn't do. Unfortunately, not everyone agrees. For example:
The liberals actually think Americans are stupid and yes, some of us are, we call them lefty-liberals but, the rest of us that have a brain do not need to hear an exact phrase in order to understand the meaning of a statement. It is just like when Obama made his closing statement. He said that when he came into office...this and this was all wrong...etc. No, he didn't use the words, "It's all Bush's fault," but dear heavens we KNOW what he was implying and he does nothing but repeat this same idea in a different fashion, each and every time he has an audience.
I guess we're also supposed to forget the recent apology made by the administration to Pakistan as well?
First the man declares this was a protest about some obscure film. Then we discover The White House was warned before the attack occurred. There was a deliberate attempt by the administration to cover this fact up because they made heavy attempts to saturate the media with this idea of a short film being the catalyst of this attack.
Then we find that Obama and his minions begin to back off of the story blaming this film. During the VP debate we learned through the laughing-fool Biden that the administration simply did not know until later on that it was a terrorist attack. Finally, the second debate with Romney, Obama claims he always called the attack one of terror. Even if we give benefit of the doubt to Obama and allow him to get away with making that claim, it doesn't explain away why he and others kept up the narrative of placing blame on the film for two weeks after the attack. It also makes Biden look foolish and clueless, considering he claims no one knew it was a terrorist attack initially.
Not only was there so much confusion going on, after the oversight hearing, we learned that the Embassy was asking for additional security because they knew they were not being properly protected. Oh, and let's not forget that this occurred on 9/11! Only a complete fool would ignore requests for additional security around the date of 9/11. With all of this information, what the hell happened?
Clinton decided to fall on her sword and take full responsibility and Obama did the same later on during the second debate. The whole situation reeks of problems. Obama has failed on all points because his administration is obviously incompetent. If all this initial diversion was centered on covering up the fact that this was a terrorist attack, then they are naive to think they could actually try to do such a thing. If they really didn't know, then they really should have just been honest in saying they didn't know and explained that they wanted to take prudent course of action. If they did know it was a terrorist attack, then why the hell didn't they call it that in the first place? No matter what, this was not handled appropriately and all evidence seems to point to the possibility they tried to do what Clinton did for 8 years -- ignore it. This was a political move, putting Obama's re-election above the interest of the country's, as well as the four men that were killed. Those four men were servants to this country and they were left to fend for themselves against hostile terrorists, an attack that most likely could have been avoided. I think we have a name for putting one's own interest above their country's. It's called TREASON and it's punishment is death.
Either way you slice it, Obama doesn't look good and it showed during the debates. Had he spent more of his time actually doing his job and not traveling, spending time on the golf course, or bowing down to world leaders, and hanging out with those cool, Hollywood celebrities, maybe he would have been more aware of what the hell was going on.
Romney won on substance and lost on having an inflated ego. Mr. Obama wins the ego award hands down.
Is this guy serious? I'm not sure how one can honestly follow what has been going on the past four years and not realize what a liar this man is.
As usual, Obama could not control himself. He was dismissive, condescending, and rude. The man cannot control his behavior for 90 minutes. Again, those of us that have watched him deal with the press know full well what an angry man he is but, hopefully it is more apparent to those that have done nothing but praise him for basically doing nothing the last four years.
He still has no plan and as far as balancing a budget. How does he plan on doing this, with another executive order? He hasn't been able to pass a budget the past three years. What makes him think this will change over the next four years? Even if he needs the majority of 60 votes to enact the budget, it still doesn't change the fact that none of the democrats will vote for his budget. Unlike Romney, he has not been willing to work with others. Just like his demeanor reveals, he is a child in an adult body playing president. I'm surprised he didn't just throw himself on the floor and begin to scream, while banging his feet and fists on the ground.
In early 2011, Barack Obama received a report from the Simpson-Bowles deficit commission he himself launched that outlined a series of significant cuts and new taxes that would have at least lowered the rate at which the country added to its debt. Obama ignored the report completely and instead proposed a budget with nearly $1.5 trillion in deficit spending, with no serious attempts to cut spending. It was so embarrassing that Republicans had to force the Democrat-controlled Senate in May 2011 to bring it up for a vote, where it failed unanimously, 0-97.Let's take a look at other fibs that came from Obama:
(The video will not allow me to embed it here, even though it does offer a code). You will have to click here to see the video for yourself.
After the debate, libs were all over the "Bayonette" comment as if it were some kind of amazing observation but it looks like the pie is on their faces now! Shhh...don't tell a liberal they are wrong, you'll be instantly called a racist.
Obama also insists that he never went on an "apology tour" as Romney pointed out. He went so far as to suggest that all those "fact check" sites confirm this for him. It's nice to know that Obama has to double check with websites devoted to his re-election in order to confirm what he did or didn't do. Unfortunately, not everyone agrees. For example:
Obama to France and Europe: “Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”Let's face it folks, he didn't use the words, "I apologize." Will "Blame America" tour suffice, Mr. Obama?
The liberals actually think Americans are stupid and yes, some of us are, we call them lefty-liberals but, the rest of us that have a brain do not need to hear an exact phrase in order to understand the meaning of a statement. It is just like when Obama made his closing statement. He said that when he came into office...this and this was all wrong...etc. No, he didn't use the words, "It's all Bush's fault," but dear heavens we KNOW what he was implying and he does nothing but repeat this same idea in a different fashion, each and every time he has an audience.
I guess we're also supposed to forget the recent apology made by the administration to Pakistan as well?
In a commercial containing clips from their Washington press conferences, subtitled in Urdu, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton said “sorry” to the mad hordes attacking the American embassy in the Pakistani capital of Islamabad and deplored the infamous anti-Muslim14-minute YouTube video.Of course, this brings us to the most recent topic that involves the revelation that the attack had nothing to do with a YouTube video. Interesting how no one has bothered to mention that the film maker, Mark Basseley Youssef (a k a Nakoula Basseley Nakoula) is still in jail!!! Obama should lose any and all credibility for how this entire situation has played out.
First the man declares this was a protest about some obscure film. Then we discover The White House was warned before the attack occurred. There was a deliberate attempt by the administration to cover this fact up because they made heavy attempts to saturate the media with this idea of a short film being the catalyst of this attack.
Then we find that Obama and his minions begin to back off of the story blaming this film. During the VP debate we learned through the laughing-fool Biden that the administration simply did not know until later on that it was a terrorist attack. Finally, the second debate with Romney, Obama claims he always called the attack one of terror. Even if we give benefit of the doubt to Obama and allow him to get away with making that claim, it doesn't explain away why he and others kept up the narrative of placing blame on the film for two weeks after the attack. It also makes Biden look foolish and clueless, considering he claims no one knew it was a terrorist attack initially.
Not only was there so much confusion going on, after the oversight hearing, we learned that the Embassy was asking for additional security because they knew they were not being properly protected. Oh, and let's not forget that this occurred on 9/11! Only a complete fool would ignore requests for additional security around the date of 9/11. With all of this information, what the hell happened?
Clinton decided to fall on her sword and take full responsibility and Obama did the same later on during the second debate. The whole situation reeks of problems. Obama has failed on all points because his administration is obviously incompetent. If all this initial diversion was centered on covering up the fact that this was a terrorist attack, then they are naive to think they could actually try to do such a thing. If they really didn't know, then they really should have just been honest in saying they didn't know and explained that they wanted to take prudent course of action. If they did know it was a terrorist attack, then why the hell didn't they call it that in the first place? No matter what, this was not handled appropriately and all evidence seems to point to the possibility they tried to do what Clinton did for 8 years -- ignore it. This was a political move, putting Obama's re-election above the interest of the country's, as well as the four men that were killed. Those four men were servants to this country and they were left to fend for themselves against hostile terrorists, an attack that most likely could have been avoided. I think we have a name for putting one's own interest above their country's. It's called TREASON and it's punishment is death.
Either way you slice it, Obama doesn't look good and it showed during the debates. Had he spent more of his time actually doing his job and not traveling, spending time on the golf course, or bowing down to world leaders, and hanging out with those cool, Hollywood celebrities, maybe he would have been more aware of what the hell was going on.
Romney won on substance and lost on having an inflated ego. Mr. Obama wins the ego award hands down.
2012-10-04
Romney Wins Debate, Obama Has a Meltdown
Let me first start off by saying, I truly thought this debate would be a close call. I calculated that if you liked Romney, you would think Romney won and if you liked Obama, you would think Obama won. I can proudly and clearly state with full confidence that Romney kicked Obama's ASS!
So, let's do a recap of what happened tonight...
So, let's do a recap of what happened tonight...
2011-11-10
Oh, NO! Perry's 53 Seconds of Hell
Yeah, this one will make you cringe. I'm not much of a Perry fan but, I feel bad for him watching this.
2011-09-13
Bachmann Attacks Perry
Last night's debate sparked some critical words from Michele Bachmann to Rick Perry. The concern originated from an executive order from Perry requiring young girls to be vaccinated in order to prevent HPV.
Click on title of this post for source article and more details.
I'm not sure it matters how much money Perry's campaign received. The bigger issue here is that while the government should step in for some epidemics, this particular vaccine is quite controversial still. I would not want my young daughter forced to take this vaccine. It is not the same as the vaccines that control the mumps or rubella. Perry may have had good intentions but, an executive order for this was the wrong call, in my opinion.
Score one for Michele.
Who do you think won the debate? Who do you like? Dislike? Comment below.
Click on title of this post for source article and more details.
I'm not sure it matters how much money Perry's campaign received. The bigger issue here is that while the government should step in for some epidemics, this particular vaccine is quite controversial still. I would not want my young daughter forced to take this vaccine. It is not the same as the vaccines that control the mumps or rubella. Perry may have had good intentions but, an executive order for this was the wrong call, in my opinion.
Score one for Michele.
Who do you think won the debate? Who do you like? Dislike? Comment below.
2010-11-19
Ann Coulter -- Bill Maher Debate
I thought I would post this here so that people who view it, may comment. Whoever posted it on youtube, disabled the comments.
The actual debate begins with the second video, as the first one is just the introduction. Enjoy and comment below.
I feel like it's so obvious how afraid liberals are of Ann expressing her conservative opinion. At some points, you can't even hear her because they are so unbelievably disrespectful.
Ann is absolutely right about the stem cell issue. I have wrote about this issue on my blog. The private industry is more than welcome to use embryonic stem cells but, they do not fund in this area because nothing has come of it. Private industry moves where there is promise to make money. The idea that labs are asking for funding from the government is proof in of itself what a failure this area has shown to be.
I know for a fact how political things have become in the area of science and government funded research. The so-called science that liberals seem to revere is not science at all but, a way for them to get money from the government to live off of, while basically doing nothing. They get money while the American people get nothing but a bunch of lies shoved down their throats.
The actual debate begins with the second video, as the first one is just the introduction. Enjoy and comment below.
I feel like it's so obvious how afraid liberals are of Ann expressing her conservative opinion. At some points, you can't even hear her because they are so unbelievably disrespectful.
Ann is absolutely right about the stem cell issue. I have wrote about this issue on my blog. The private industry is more than welcome to use embryonic stem cells but, they do not fund in this area because nothing has come of it. Private industry moves where there is promise to make money. The idea that labs are asking for funding from the government is proof in of itself what a failure this area has shown to be.
I know for a fact how political things have become in the area of science and government funded research. The so-called science that liberals seem to revere is not science at all but, a way for them to get money from the government to live off of, while basically doing nothing. They get money while the American people get nothing but a bunch of lies shoved down their throats.
2010-10-22
CAIR Debates Juan Williams
More on Juan's response to his firing:
"It's not a bigoted statement,” he told Fox News in an interview the cable news network ran throughout the day. “In fact, in the course of this conversation with Bill O'Reilly, I said we have an obligation as Americans to be careful to protect the constitutional rights of everyone in our country and to make sure that we don't have any outbreak of bigotry. But that there's a reality. You cannot ignore what happened on 9/11, and you cannot ignore the connection to Islamic radicalism, and you can't ignore the fact of what has even recently been said in court with regard to this is the first drop of blood in a Muslim war in America."
Also from The Alternative Conservative -
More On Juan Williams Getting Fired From NPR
2010-10-19
Cuomo and Paladino Debate
On Monday, the debate for NY governor between Cuomo and Paladino focused on repairing the state and control on spending.
Click title of post for full article.
Paladino called for cuts in spending on Medicaid and state-mandated education programs he called "debilitating."
"Our elderly are being taxed out of their homes," he said. "Our youth are being driven out of the state because they can't raise their families with these property taxes."Currently, Cuomo is in the lead. A democrat winning in NY? I'm so shocked. This state is so predictable.
While the presence of several fringe candidates -- among them a former madam supporting legalization of prostitution and a candidate on the "Rent is 2 Damn High" ticket -- livened up the debate, Paladino and Cuomo were polite and restrained in their remarks.
Click title of post for full article.
2010-10-14
Christine O'Donnell & Chris Coons Debate
Delaware is making some waves. The O'Donnell debate with Coons has become quite the hot topic.
Either way, feelings are strong on both sides of this debate. What do you think of O'Donnell?
Click title of post for full article.
Either way, feelings are strong on both sides of this debate. What do you think of O'Donnell?
Click title of post for full article.
2009-09-04
Michael Savage Debate At Cambridge
Michael Savage has been given an invitation to a debate at Cambridge, concerning Political Correctness.
I think it would be nice if he went and tied some socialists up in a pretzel.
You can read all about it on his website.
I think it would be nice if he went and tied some socialists up in a pretzel.
You can read all about it on his website.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)