Let me just first say that I have always, always LOVED Robert Downey Jr. Ever since I was a young kid I have adored him because he has always been so incredibly talented. Even in his dark days, I really liked this guy. I always had hope for him and to watch him climb from the gutters of addiction and become the star he is today is just incredible and makes an American proud.
This interview that was done by some dullard from the UK starts off with asking questions about the new movie coming out for Iron Man.
Finally the guy decides to badger Downey about a quote that was from Downey several years ago. Here is some history...
Downey did an interview after he got himself cleaned up and he made a quote that became rather controversial in Hollywood but was celebrated among the conservatives in America. This was from The New York Times in 2008:
“I have a really interesting political point of view, and it’s not always something I say too loud at dinner tables here. But you can’t go from a $2,000-a-night suite at La Mirage to a penitentiary and really understand it and come out a liberal. You can’t. I wouldn’t wish that experience on anyone else, but it was very, very, very educational for me and has informed my proclivities and politics every since.”
I have always believed that Downey was not necessarily speaking about being a Republican but rather that he changed in such a way that showed him the importance of taking personal responsibility for his life. Rather than externalizing blame, one needs to find strength inside of themselves.
If you have ever known people who have battled with drug abuse or alcohol abuse, it is clear that many of them carry along a victim type mentality. Now couple all this with Downey's fairly privileged background being born into Hollywood royalty, it's easy to see how a person can become full of themselves. Indulging in drugs and leading a careless life eventually led him to reach a bottom that many in Hollywood never see. That type of change clearly led him to becoming more humble and in turn generally more conservative. It goes along with the same old adage, "If you're in your 20's and you're not a liberal, you have no heart but if you're in your 30's and you're not a conservative you have no brain."
It's about growing up and it's about maturing. Some people put labels on it but, sometimes these labels change and sometimes the labels are accurate. I believe Downey was there to do an interview and not discuss politics. He's an actor and ultimately he's representing the studio. He's not there to isolate audience members talking about politics or philosophy. The questioning as it pertains to this type of interview was uncalled for and confrontational.
I'm very glad to see Downey walk out. It doesn't matter what he believed then or now. This type of questioning did not belong in this interview.
2015-04-21
Thinking Critically - Maddox Debunks Wage Myth
The Obama years have brought us controversy. One issue after the other is discussed in such a way to divide Americans. We now have more animosity between blacks and whites, illegals and citizens, criminals and law enforcement, and of course women and men.
Yes, one can argue that Americans do need to discuss many difficult issues. Certainly it is better to discuss things than to sweep them under the rug. We can also argue that these discussions could be more productive if we are more willing to deal with real facts and real issues rather than propaganda and entirely made up statistics for the purposes of pushing an agenda.
How many times have we been told of a story about an important issue where someone has cited a statistic to support them or cited some wild story that occurred, only to discover the stats were misleading or the initial reports surrounding the story were completely wrong? Let's face it, if these issues were so prevalent it would actually be quite easy to find a good story to support their issues. It would not be necessary to fudge facts and/or numbers.
Most Americans have no problems discussing issues that are of major concern but let us always take the time to vet stories until all the facts rise to the surface and let us always remain true to the facts, no matter how uncomfortable they might make us.
The following video by Maddox debunks perfectly and thoroughly the myth of women's wages that has been making its rounds AGAIN in the last year.
Yes, one can argue that Americans do need to discuss many difficult issues. Certainly it is better to discuss things than to sweep them under the rug. We can also argue that these discussions could be more productive if we are more willing to deal with real facts and real issues rather than propaganda and entirely made up statistics for the purposes of pushing an agenda.
How many times have we been told of a story about an important issue where someone has cited a statistic to support them or cited some wild story that occurred, only to discover the stats were misleading or the initial reports surrounding the story were completely wrong? Let's face it, if these issues were so prevalent it would actually be quite easy to find a good story to support their issues. It would not be necessary to fudge facts and/or numbers.
Most Americans have no problems discussing issues that are of major concern but let us always take the time to vet stories until all the facts rise to the surface and let us always remain true to the facts, no matter how uncomfortable they might make us.
The following video by Maddox debunks perfectly and thoroughly the myth of women's wages that has been making its rounds AGAIN in the last year.
2015-04-19
Idiocy That People Like and I Cannot Stand
Pulp Fiction
For years people around me have glorified this movie, demanding I watch it and go on and on ad nauseam about how great it is, how original it is, etc. I remember when it first came out. The hype of this movie was over the top, even before it was officially released.
2015-04-13
UVA Hoax - Rape Hoax- Feminists - Have They Declared a War on Men?
Just when you think you've heard the whole story....there's more...
*The following content deals with sensitive material*
Jackie Coakley is the sole source of Rolling Stone Magazine's recently retracted "gang rape" article written by Sabrina Rubin Erdely. Her name has been outed by several other sources all over the internet and after reading the context of this story and watching interviews given by the three friends that are referenced in the original I have no qualms about publishing her name.
*The following content deals with sensitive material*
Jackie Coakley is the sole source of Rolling Stone Magazine's recently retracted "gang rape" article written by Sabrina Rubin Erdely. Her name has been outed by several other sources all over the internet and after reading the context of this story and watching interviews given by the three friends that are referenced in the original I have no qualms about publishing her name.
2015-04-07
Rolling Stone's- Jackie and Her Gang Rape
**This article contains sensitive material. Please be advised.**
"A Rape On Campus" an article written by Sabrina Rubin Erdely was recently retracted by Rolling Stone magazine. Everyone is issuing an apology and of course that's all fine and dandy but the damage is done. A victim crying rape and then later discovering the allegation is false is not something the accused can bounce back from immediately.
"A Rape On Campus" an article written by Sabrina Rubin Erdely was recently retracted by Rolling Stone magazine. Everyone is issuing an apology and of course that's all fine and dandy but the damage is done. A victim crying rape and then later discovering the allegation is false is not something the accused can bounce back from immediately.
2015-04-05
So What Did Knox See In That Bathroom of Hers?
This video has been posted in defense of Knox, suggesting that since the blood was minimal it would not be unusual or odd for her to think anything about taking a shower.
Knox wrote an email to her friends and family about what occurred in Italy on Sunday November 4th, just days after the murder. In the email she states the following concerning the blood in the bathroom:
Knox wrote an email to her friends and family about what occurred in Italy on Sunday November 4th, just days after the murder. In the email she states the following concerning the blood in the bathroom:
2015-04-03
Amanda Knox - Raffaele Sollecito Flow Chart
***Revised***
When reality and facts are too much to deal with, this chart can help explain away the guilt! You too can be a Know-fam supporter. It's easy to do. No education or research is necessary! In fact the best supporters out there lack both!
Now that the trial has finally ended, it will be even easier for you to solidify the fantasy of innocence.
When reality and facts are too much to deal with, this chart can help explain away the guilt! You too can be a Know-fam supporter. It's easy to do. No education or research is necessary! In fact the best supporters out there lack both!
Now that the trial has finally ended, it will be even easier for you to solidify the fantasy of innocence.
However there are still those "haters" out there that will want to challenge you with facts and reason. They will want to point out the absurdity of the latest verdict. Armed with this flow chart, you can continue to fool yourself and others that justice was served.
The flow chart can be used to explain how Sollecito and Knox are innocent. *cough*
Click to enlarge.
2015-03-31
Knox and Sollecito - Not Guilty?
Yes, you read that correct. I am still a bit shell shocked over this recent decision by Italy's highest court. In addition no re-trial was ordered. It seems that as far as the murder is concerned these two have been given the permission to walk away free and clear. This is it. This is their final verdict.
It took me quite some time to write this as the verdict was announced Friday and here it is Wednesday the following week. We will have to wait even longer for the reasoning from the court. According to sources I have read this means an additional 45 days.
While I do not agree with this final verdict, I am forced to accept it. I am glad it's over but, I am so very disappointed. It's Casey Anthony verdict all over again. Still, I wait anxiously to read the court's reasoning for making this ruling. It all seems to make no sense considering the evidence. It is near impossible for me to believe these two were not involved in this crime.
Pretty much everyone who has known these two are guilty are in complete shock. There are more questions then answers. How could this have happened? Was this a political decision? Was someone paid off? Did Sollecito's father pay for this judgement as he tried to pay for witnesses prior? It all makes no sense.
Here are Knox and her mother reacting to the decision:
Rough transcript (yes I'm being sarcastic, my usual a##hole self):
Yes, it amazes me how there were no tears and almost forced emotions when it came to talking about Meredith. Meredith was a complete afterthought for her and STILL she can only worry about Amanda. Yes, she was the lucky one indeed. She comes across so very fake to me.
I still cannot believe that so many people bought into the US media and the bizarre things they claimed concerning this case. The trial testimony is for all to see.
I want to hear what Rudy has to say. I really do. I wonder how he feels knowing that he will be the only one who will serve time for this murder.
I have much more to write but as of right now, I can only say that I will wait for the court's report. I have grave doubts about its accuracy and reasoning but at the same time I realize I have no other choice but to accept this verdict.
The ONE and only thing I believe we can ALL agree on would be that this process was way too long. It's much too long for the victim's family. It's also much too long for Knox and Sollecito's family. Yes, of course I believe completely in their guilt but a defendant does have a right to know their verdict. This was much too slow to be called justice.
It took me quite some time to write this as the verdict was announced Friday and here it is Wednesday the following week. We will have to wait even longer for the reasoning from the court. According to sources I have read this means an additional 45 days.
While I do not agree with this final verdict, I am forced to accept it. I am glad it's over but, I am so very disappointed. It's Casey Anthony verdict all over again. Still, I wait anxiously to read the court's reasoning for making this ruling. It all seems to make no sense considering the evidence. It is near impossible for me to believe these two were not involved in this crime.
Pretty much everyone who has known these two are guilty are in complete shock. There are more questions then answers. How could this have happened? Was this a political decision? Was someone paid off? Did Sollecito's father pay for this judgement as he tried to pay for witnesses prior? It all makes no sense.
Here are Knox and her mother reacting to the decision:
Rough transcript (yes I'm being sarcastic, my usual a##hole self):
I just wanted to say that I'm incredibly grateful for being able to walk away free. You saved my life because I almost had to get hauled off to jail again. I'm still absorbing this moment. I can't believe these judges were so incredibly stupid. I'm so happy! I want to do cartwheels.
Knox's mom says she's so happy.
Oh yeah, better say something about Meredith..... ugh....let me see.....ugh...yeah, let me pause and get dramatic. Am I emotional enough? She was my friend. She deserved a lot but she f###ing bled to death and I'm the lucky one! I could just kill for a pizza! Hahahaha! Bye!
Yes, it amazes me how there were no tears and almost forced emotions when it came to talking about Meredith. Meredith was a complete afterthought for her and STILL she can only worry about Amanda. Yes, she was the lucky one indeed. She comes across so very fake to me.
I still cannot believe that so many people bought into the US media and the bizarre things they claimed concerning this case. The trial testimony is for all to see.
I want to hear what Rudy has to say. I really do. I wonder how he feels knowing that he will be the only one who will serve time for this murder.
I have much more to write but as of right now, I can only say that I will wait for the court's report. I have grave doubts about its accuracy and reasoning but at the same time I realize I have no other choice but to accept this verdict.
The ONE and only thing I believe we can ALL agree on would be that this process was way too long. It's much too long for the victim's family. It's also much too long for Knox and Sollecito's family. Yes, of course I believe completely in their guilt but a defendant does have a right to know their verdict. This was much too slow to be called justice.
2015-03-30
Remember That Guy Who Harassed The Women at Chic-fil-A?
Well, that guy claims he is now on food stamps.
Yes, Adam M. Smith was fired from his high paying CFO job and now has been forced into unemployment and he is now collecting food stamps from the government. His wife has now had to go to work and he is at home taking care of their boys.
This story was also featured on a special that I happened to catch on TV. I believe it was on ABC News 20/20.
I am seeing a lot of stuff on my Facebook wall - "karma's a bitch!" and "Justice served chicken style!"
Okay, yeah I agree. What this guy did was douche-bag multiplied by a thousand.
The man had a problem with Chic-fil-A's general support of marriage between a man and a women. Now this comment itself was taken to the extreme. Just because someone supports traditional marriage does not mean they dislikes gays. It's a common belief found among many in America and people certainly have a right to say so. People came out in droves to support Chic-fil-A.
So this Adam guy has a problem with Chic-fil-A's stance on marriage and instead of writing to the company or addressing them directly, he made the choice to go to a single location and go through the drive-thru. Using a camera, he records this encounter that he initiates with the woman who is at the window. He basically does everything he can to humiliate her and demean her because she works at Chic-fil-A. The few minutes he spends talking to her is riddled with self-righteousness and arrogance.
After he records this, he goes home and uploads the video onto You Tube. This again was HIS choice. The video goes viral and when he goes to work he is asked to resign. He refuses and is immediately fired. From this point on he cannot find a job. He tried being forthcoming with this incident in interviews but, this tactic has also failed. He did offer an apology on You Tube but, still this man has seen no hope of obtaining a job and now must collect food stamps.
It's hard for me to believe he cannot find a job anywhere. It seems to me he will be forced to swallow his pride and get a low level job and hopefully find a way to work up in the company. I don't understand how this would be all that difficult to do. Yes, it sucks but considering his current situation it would seem to me that would be the best route to go at this point. He has a family he needs to provide for and he needs to be an example for his children. It does him no good crying and acting like a victim. Nobody did this to him. This was a choice HE made and it was indeed quite foolish.
Adam, swallow your pride and get a job at McDonald's or some other unskilled job. There is NO shame in going to an honest job. It's certainly better then doing nothing.
On the other side however, I do not see this as "justice" of any sort. The man is down and out. There is nothing "karma-like" about being forced out of your job and then being in a situation where you can no longer support your family. These comments about "justice served" and "karma's a bitch" to name a few are pretty heartless and do not reflect well on the characters who are declaring them.
The guy made a mistake - a big dumb one at that but, he did do something he believed in. He didn't physically attack her or rape her or rob her. He stated an opinion that is not all that out of the norm. Many people support the idea of gay marriage and many people feel it is a right that is being denied. While some may or may not agree with it, I think the backlash towards this man has been a bit too much, too harsh, and just plain nasty. Him having to go on food stamps is not a solution. He needs to get back to work and he needs to be able to contribute back to society.
Yes, I think he was wrong but I also think the guy has learned from his mistake. I also know that at times I myself have lashed out or been angry and expressed this in unhealthy ways. We ALL do it and if you've even been on the internet, you likely have participated this behavior yourself. If you haven't - well bless your heart you're a million times better then me.
Next time Adam has an issue, I believe he will take a better, more reasonable route to express his concerns. I hope he gets a job and he is able to get his life back on track. I wish him the best. I don't see any benefit in kicking this man while he's down. It's not appropriate. He did not even commit a crime. Let's all find it in our hearts to forgive.
It's time to forgive this man.
Yes, Adam M. Smith was fired from his high paying CFO job and now has been forced into unemployment and he is now collecting food stamps from the government. His wife has now had to go to work and he is at home taking care of their boys.
This story was also featured on a special that I happened to catch on TV. I believe it was on ABC News 20/20.
I am seeing a lot of stuff on my Facebook wall - "karma's a bitch!" and "Justice served chicken style!"
Okay, yeah I agree. What this guy did was douche-bag multiplied by a thousand.
The man had a problem with Chic-fil-A's general support of marriage between a man and a women. Now this comment itself was taken to the extreme. Just because someone supports traditional marriage does not mean they dislikes gays. It's a common belief found among many in America and people certainly have a right to say so. People came out in droves to support Chic-fil-A.
So this Adam guy has a problem with Chic-fil-A's stance on marriage and instead of writing to the company or addressing them directly, he made the choice to go to a single location and go through the drive-thru. Using a camera, he records this encounter that he initiates with the woman who is at the window. He basically does everything he can to humiliate her and demean her because she works at Chic-fil-A. The few minutes he spends talking to her is riddled with self-righteousness and arrogance.
After he records this, he goes home and uploads the video onto You Tube. This again was HIS choice. The video goes viral and when he goes to work he is asked to resign. He refuses and is immediately fired. From this point on he cannot find a job. He tried being forthcoming with this incident in interviews but, this tactic has also failed. He did offer an apology on You Tube but, still this man has seen no hope of obtaining a job and now must collect food stamps.
It's hard for me to believe he cannot find a job anywhere. It seems to me he will be forced to swallow his pride and get a low level job and hopefully find a way to work up in the company. I don't understand how this would be all that difficult to do. Yes, it sucks but considering his current situation it would seem to me that would be the best route to go at this point. He has a family he needs to provide for and he needs to be an example for his children. It does him no good crying and acting like a victim. Nobody did this to him. This was a choice HE made and it was indeed quite foolish.
Adam, swallow your pride and get a job at McDonald's or some other unskilled job. There is NO shame in going to an honest job. It's certainly better then doing nothing.
On the other side however, I do not see this as "justice" of any sort. The man is down and out. There is nothing "karma-like" about being forced out of your job and then being in a situation where you can no longer support your family. These comments about "justice served" and "karma's a bitch" to name a few are pretty heartless and do not reflect well on the characters who are declaring them.
The guy made a mistake - a big dumb one at that but, he did do something he believed in. He didn't physically attack her or rape her or rob her. He stated an opinion that is not all that out of the norm. Many people support the idea of gay marriage and many people feel it is a right that is being denied. While some may or may not agree with it, I think the backlash towards this man has been a bit too much, too harsh, and just plain nasty. Him having to go on food stamps is not a solution. He needs to get back to work and he needs to be able to contribute back to society.
Yes, I think he was wrong but I also think the guy has learned from his mistake. I also know that at times I myself have lashed out or been angry and expressed this in unhealthy ways. We ALL do it and if you've even been on the internet, you likely have participated this behavior yourself. If you haven't - well bless your heart you're a million times better then me.
Next time Adam has an issue, I believe he will take a better, more reasonable route to express his concerns. I hope he gets a job and he is able to get his life back on track. I wish him the best. I don't see any benefit in kicking this man while he's down. It's not appropriate. He did not even commit a crime. Let's all find it in our hearts to forgive.
It's time to forgive this man.
2015-03-17
25 Years Ago Madonna's Truth or Dare
I remember going to the theater to see this first-of-its-kind (not really), documentary Truth or Dare. It's hard to believe it was 25 years ago - holy cow! Am I really that old? Oh yeah.
I was definitely a Madonna fan but, as the years have gone by, I guess you could say my interest in her has generally faded. However, there are times when her name comes up and I will read an article or watch a performance (The Super Bowl being the last). This last week, I had come upon a recent interview that Madonna did with Howard Stern.
The English accent of hers was gone and while the interview by itself is worthy of review, the topic of Truth or Dare and its 25 year anniversary caught my attention. I thought I'd go back and watch it.
For a small fee of 3 dollars, I rented this on YouTube.
When I had watched it before, I was only in high school so I didn't put much thought into this documentary at all. Maybe it was because I was too young or maybe I just didn't care. I remember I enjoyed it. I liked the performances but, I do remember thinking Madonna was a little bizarre and obnoxious.
Now that I have taken the time to re-watch it, I noticed a few things I didn't notice before and yes, Madonna is still obnoxious.
The film goes back and forth between black and white and color. The black and white parts are grainy and cover the scenes that are off-stage, while the colored film is found during Madonna's performances. It covers the time frame of the Blonde Ambition Tour.
The opening scene includes a voice-over from Madonna who is seen picking up a mess in her hotel room, as if a party had just dispersed and Madonna slides into bed, apparently finding no need to use the bathroom, wash her face, and brush her teeth.
The next scene we immediately see an angry Madonna who is frustrated with what appears to be a sound check at rehearsal before a show in Japan. We soon see that the weather is awful and Madonna is forced to perform in the rain.
The film immediately jumps to the United States but the only thing that tells us this is another voice-over from Madonna. This hopping around is found throughout the film and consequently I found myself asking, "Did I miss something?" It's highly disjointed and some parts seem to drop off and never return again; the stories are never brought to a conclusion. So often I wanted to know what happened next?
Madonna also has two hair styles during this tour. One is a long blonde pony tail which is a hair extension affixed with a braided hair piece that wraps around the base of the pony tail. The other style consists of short tight blonde curls.
Madonna immediately lets us know she identifies herself as being a motherly figure for her dancers and staff. The film then cuts to their real mothers coming to visit them and Madonna is excited to meet them all. Of course she later carries on about how all of her dancers have suffered in some way and her only desire has been to love them and give them the opportunity of a lifetime.
Interestingly enough Madonna refers to Chicago as a conservative town. I'm not sure where she got that idea?? I don't remember Chicago being conservative, not now and not 25 years ago.
So we're about 15 minutes in and we have yet to see Madonna being anything other than in full-control. There is nothing revealing and certainly nothing that gives the audience any in-depth perception of who she is.
Now enters the dancer Ollie, who claims to be the only straight male dancer (although this is questionable), and we see him waiting to meet his father. Interestingly there is no mention of his mother or where she is, or why she wasn't there? Here again, we have no understanding and this topic doesn't come up again.
The film cuts to Oh Father and the camera angles force us to question if this was actually filmed at a live performance.
Cut to Madonna's hotel room and Madonna is slurping her soup and talking to her dad on the phone. She demands he tell her if he's coming to the show, how many tickets he wants, and who is coming with him.
Now comes the technical problems - during Madonna's performance of Keep it Together we can hear her mic cut in and out. Then backstage, Madonna begins yelling at her tech person about the issue she was experiencing but the entire scene looks staged.
Finally we get a glimpse of Madonna's eyebrows being touched up, her staff kissing her ass while she complains, and her boy toy - the famous Warren Beatty. Warren is found throughout the documentary but at some point he just drops off and we never hear from him again.
Kevin Costner comes back stage and makes the mistake of telling Madonna her show was "neat" which prompted Madonna to turn around and simulate puking with a finger in her mouth.
The next scene shows Madonna getting ready for some event and calling Warren to find out his whereabouts, she then slams the phone down calling him an a--h---.
The film jumps again and we are in Toronto. Madonna who is sporting her pony tail, is approached by her brother who tells her that her actions (feign masturbation) found during the song of Like a Virgin will prompt the police to arrest her after the show because in Canada this is considered an immoral live performance. Madonna tells her dancers and they all pray in a circle. Madonna leads the prayer but the prayer seems to address her dancers directly rather than addressing the Lord.
Madonna is never seen happier during this film. She is almost giddy like a child and tells everyone that she will not change her show. She is an artist who is expressing herself. She will not compromise her artistic integrity.
What is interesting is that while the film does show Madonna performing Like a Virgin, the version they show is one where Madonna is sporting her tight curls, not the long pony tail we just saw her clearly wearing in the previous scene. So why did they not show the actual performance that she did in Toronto? The film then cuts to a news clip which shows her performing with her long pony tail and it's reported that the police found nothing wrong and they did not arrest her.
The entire episode in Toronto seems staged. I have no idea why the police would even bother unless Madonna were actually performing sex or a sexual act in the flesh there would be no cause for her to be arrested. The way she carried on about being an artist and expressing herself was just self-serving.
In Detroit, we see Madonna bring her father onstage and she asks everyone to sing Happy Birthday for him. Her father and I guess her step mom (no indication is made), come back to what we assume is her green room. Madonna explains that she bowed at her father's feet onstage because she forgot to buy her father a birthday present!
We then see that Madonna is expecting her brother Marty to arrive for a visit, but she is whispering to some guy about how to handle him when he arrives. There is of course no reason for her to whisper; it's all weird and once again staged. Marty apparently had/has an issue with alcohol and at this time had a recent stint in a rehab.
Marty later explains to the audience that he had some trouble getting to the hotel; he eventually arrived but very late and missed Madonna because she had already retired for the evening.
Almost an hour in and once again we have another staged scene. Madonna has yet to show any vulnerability. Madonna first tells her make-up artist Sharon that she used to beat up on girls like her in high school. Then she says that Sharon reminds her of Moira McFarland, an old friend of hers. It would be later confirmed that this woman was contacted and her presence in the film was thrown upon Madonna at the last minute.
Moira McFarland is introduced to Madonna who is apparently so busy she can't take even a minute of her time to sit down with her old childhood friend. Moira gives Madonna a painting and tells her that she is pregnant again and wants Madonna to be the Godmother. Madonna tells her thank you but, she simply cannot answer her at this moment. She quickly removes herself with another "thank you" for the painting and an exchange of love you's. Moira then tells us how much she loves Madonna and how she loved Madonna's mother. We never do find out if Madonna accepts her plea to be the child's Godmother.
Now we are at the famous scene where Madonna decides to lay down on her mother's grave and speculate that her mom is probably just a bunch of dust at this point. Her brother Christopher would later state that this moment is where he truly began to question his sister and see her in a different way saying that nothing was off-limits for his sister. I have yet to see anyone give this scene a positive review. In fact this scene seems to truly repulse anyone who has watched it. I'm not sure what Madonna had in mind doing this scene in the first place. Her mother died when Madonna was only five years old. Her memories of her mother would be few and while it's reasonable for her to visit her mother's grave whenever she is in town, it is highly inappropriate for her to film the event.
The next scene might offer some insight as to why her and Warren split up. Madonna is forced to cancel some shows because she has lost her voice. A doctor is visiting her at a hotel and I believe she is in New York at this point. Even though her hair is in a towel, appearing freshly showered, her make-up is fully done, flawlessly. Beatty makes quite a few comments about how crazy it is she is doing all this stuff on camera and how insane the environment is. Madonna clearly loves it and seems to disregard any point he is trying to make. Warren might as well be an inanimate object in Madonna's world. This will be the last we see of him in the film.
One of her dancers appears on a radio show where the host asks her about a tabloid that says Madonna dumped Warren for a dancer - Ollie. She denies the claim but, I guess the audience is to infer the pair did break up, only Madonna is not dating Ollie.
Hands down the most disturbing part of this documentary comes when Madonna is told about her make-up artist Sharon waking up in her hotel with her anus bleeding. She had gone to a club and claims she was not drinking but, clearly she was slipped a roofie or something similar. Madonna's reaction? She laughs. Then she speculates that Sharon must have been telling these guys she met she worked with Madonna and they drugged her and messed with her. Sharon is then seen in the dressing room with the dancers telling them what happened and they express an equal amount of no sympathy. Nobody encourages this woman to go to the police. NOBODY even offers the slightest amount of sympathy or concern for this poor woman. It's appalling and very disturbing.
So while Madonna would like to fancy herself as a mother figure to her dancers and staff, she shows absolutely no inkling of being motherly in this instance. A staff member of hers is drugged and raped and she laughs?
"Oh well," in Madonna's world - the show must go on.
It's hard to watch anything past this point. Madonna is soon back on stage prancing around to the song Holiday and the film just moves along as if nothing happened.
Off to Europe....
Madonna finds herself at odds with the Vatican again. Eventually she cancels some shows because of the animosity.
Sandra Bernhard visits Madonna. Remember her? Ugh. She was famous for about 16 minutes in the late 80's, which was 16 minutes way too long. Madonna tells Sandra she wants to meet Antonio Banderas.
Surprise surprise she meets him and he's married.
The movie begins to wrap up and Madonna is playing the game Truth or Dare with her dancers. She performs a lewd act on a bottle and reveals her true love to be Sean - as in Sean Penn. This is the ONLY scene that is revealing and shows Madonna being sincere. The rest of the movie is really her just trying her best to shock people with her generic, obnoxious humor.
In another scene, Madonna reveals that she's not interested in being a great singer or dancer; she just wants to push people's buttons and be political.
Finally the movie ends with Madonna and her dancers in her bed - completely scripted.
While I did enjoy watching some parts of this film again, it is clear this movie is very different to me watching as an adult.
Now more than ever I realize how truly narcissistic she was. Other people are objects to Madonna. They are to be entertained and should provide entertainment for her, but not to be recognized as having their own feelings and they certainly should not express their feelings to her directly.
On a positive note, Madonna has shown indications in her latest interview that she has indeed grown up in some ways. It's easy to be hard on Madonna and criticize her but it's hard to relate to a person who has been in the public eye for as long as she has been. The woman has literally been worshiped by millions of people across the globe so what can any of us really expect?
What makes her so special? She is right. She's not the best singer; she's never been in an acting role that has amounted to showing any exceptional talent; she's not the greatest dancer. She's mediocre at best. She does manage to keep control over her image and she knows how to manipulate the media and based on this film she definitely knows how to manipulate others around her. She also has a lot of confidence. Maybe we like her because she proves you can be successful and not be the "best." No doubt she does work and she keeps moving forward, no matter what obstacles stand in her way.
Is she a good role model for women? I don't think so. Something tells me that the woman in our country who fought for voting rights and equal treatment were not interested in women taking this power and using it the way Madonna has.
One thing I do like about her is that she never seems to take on the victim-status like so many other celebrities do. She has never found herself in rehab. She is not known for her drug use or alcohol abuse. In fact, she actually seems to take good care of her body and enjoys being healthy.
Love her or hate her, she is an icon in American culture and nothing will change that.
I was definitely a Madonna fan but, as the years have gone by, I guess you could say my interest in her has generally faded. However, there are times when her name comes up and I will read an article or watch a performance (The Super Bowl being the last). This last week, I had come upon a recent interview that Madonna did with Howard Stern.
The English accent of hers was gone and while the interview by itself is worthy of review, the topic of Truth or Dare and its 25 year anniversary caught my attention. I thought I'd go back and watch it.
For a small fee of 3 dollars, I rented this on YouTube.
When I had watched it before, I was only in high school so I didn't put much thought into this documentary at all. Maybe it was because I was too young or maybe I just didn't care. I remember I enjoyed it. I liked the performances but, I do remember thinking Madonna was a little bizarre and obnoxious.
Now that I have taken the time to re-watch it, I noticed a few things I didn't notice before and yes, Madonna is still obnoxious.
The film goes back and forth between black and white and color. The black and white parts are grainy and cover the scenes that are off-stage, while the colored film is found during Madonna's performances. It covers the time frame of the Blonde Ambition Tour.
The opening scene includes a voice-over from Madonna who is seen picking up a mess in her hotel room, as if a party had just dispersed and Madonna slides into bed, apparently finding no need to use the bathroom, wash her face, and brush her teeth.
The next scene we immediately see an angry Madonna who is frustrated with what appears to be a sound check at rehearsal before a show in Japan. We soon see that the weather is awful and Madonna is forced to perform in the rain.
The film immediately jumps to the United States but the only thing that tells us this is another voice-over from Madonna. This hopping around is found throughout the film and consequently I found myself asking, "Did I miss something?" It's highly disjointed and some parts seem to drop off and never return again; the stories are never brought to a conclusion. So often I wanted to know what happened next?
Madonna also has two hair styles during this tour. One is a long blonde pony tail which is a hair extension affixed with a braided hair piece that wraps around the base of the pony tail. The other style consists of short tight blonde curls.
Madonna immediately lets us know she identifies herself as being a motherly figure for her dancers and staff. The film then cuts to their real mothers coming to visit them and Madonna is excited to meet them all. Of course she later carries on about how all of her dancers have suffered in some way and her only desire has been to love them and give them the opportunity of a lifetime.
Interestingly enough Madonna refers to Chicago as a conservative town. I'm not sure where she got that idea?? I don't remember Chicago being conservative, not now and not 25 years ago.
So we're about 15 minutes in and we have yet to see Madonna being anything other than in full-control. There is nothing revealing and certainly nothing that gives the audience any in-depth perception of who she is.
Now enters the dancer Ollie, who claims to be the only straight male dancer (although this is questionable), and we see him waiting to meet his father. Interestingly there is no mention of his mother or where she is, or why she wasn't there? Here again, we have no understanding and this topic doesn't come up again.
The film cuts to Oh Father and the camera angles force us to question if this was actually filmed at a live performance.
Cut to Madonna's hotel room and Madonna is slurping her soup and talking to her dad on the phone. She demands he tell her if he's coming to the show, how many tickets he wants, and who is coming with him.
Now comes the technical problems - during Madonna's performance of Keep it Together we can hear her mic cut in and out. Then backstage, Madonna begins yelling at her tech person about the issue she was experiencing but the entire scene looks staged.
Finally we get a glimpse of Madonna's eyebrows being touched up, her staff kissing her ass while she complains, and her boy toy - the famous Warren Beatty. Warren is found throughout the documentary but at some point he just drops off and we never hear from him again.
Kevin Costner comes back stage and makes the mistake of telling Madonna her show was "neat" which prompted Madonna to turn around and simulate puking with a finger in her mouth.
The next scene shows Madonna getting ready for some event and calling Warren to find out his whereabouts, she then slams the phone down calling him an a--h---.
The film jumps again and we are in Toronto. Madonna who is sporting her pony tail, is approached by her brother who tells her that her actions (feign masturbation) found during the song of Like a Virgin will prompt the police to arrest her after the show because in Canada this is considered an immoral live performance. Madonna tells her dancers and they all pray in a circle. Madonna leads the prayer but the prayer seems to address her dancers directly rather than addressing the Lord.
Madonna is never seen happier during this film. She is almost giddy like a child and tells everyone that she will not change her show. She is an artist who is expressing herself. She will not compromise her artistic integrity.
What is interesting is that while the film does show Madonna performing Like a Virgin, the version they show is one where Madonna is sporting her tight curls, not the long pony tail we just saw her clearly wearing in the previous scene. So why did they not show the actual performance that she did in Toronto? The film then cuts to a news clip which shows her performing with her long pony tail and it's reported that the police found nothing wrong and they did not arrest her.
The entire episode in Toronto seems staged. I have no idea why the police would even bother unless Madonna were actually performing sex or a sexual act in the flesh there would be no cause for her to be arrested. The way she carried on about being an artist and expressing herself was just self-serving.
In Detroit, we see Madonna bring her father onstage and she asks everyone to sing Happy Birthday for him. Her father and I guess her step mom (no indication is made), come back to what we assume is her green room. Madonna explains that she bowed at her father's feet onstage because she forgot to buy her father a birthday present!
We then see that Madonna is expecting her brother Marty to arrive for a visit, but she is whispering to some guy about how to handle him when he arrives. There is of course no reason for her to whisper; it's all weird and once again staged. Marty apparently had/has an issue with alcohol and at this time had a recent stint in a rehab.
Marty later explains to the audience that he had some trouble getting to the hotel; he eventually arrived but very late and missed Madonna because she had already retired for the evening.
Almost an hour in and once again we have another staged scene. Madonna has yet to show any vulnerability. Madonna first tells her make-up artist Sharon that she used to beat up on girls like her in high school. Then she says that Sharon reminds her of Moira McFarland, an old friend of hers. It would be later confirmed that this woman was contacted and her presence in the film was thrown upon Madonna at the last minute.
Moira McFarland is introduced to Madonna who is apparently so busy she can't take even a minute of her time to sit down with her old childhood friend. Moira gives Madonna a painting and tells her that she is pregnant again and wants Madonna to be the Godmother. Madonna tells her thank you but, she simply cannot answer her at this moment. She quickly removes herself with another "thank you" for the painting and an exchange of love you's. Moira then tells us how much she loves Madonna and how she loved Madonna's mother. We never do find out if Madonna accepts her plea to be the child's Godmother.
Now we are at the famous scene where Madonna decides to lay down on her mother's grave and speculate that her mom is probably just a bunch of dust at this point. Her brother Christopher would later state that this moment is where he truly began to question his sister and see her in a different way saying that nothing was off-limits for his sister. I have yet to see anyone give this scene a positive review. In fact this scene seems to truly repulse anyone who has watched it. I'm not sure what Madonna had in mind doing this scene in the first place. Her mother died when Madonna was only five years old. Her memories of her mother would be few and while it's reasonable for her to visit her mother's grave whenever she is in town, it is highly inappropriate for her to film the event.
The next scene might offer some insight as to why her and Warren split up. Madonna is forced to cancel some shows because she has lost her voice. A doctor is visiting her at a hotel and I believe she is in New York at this point. Even though her hair is in a towel, appearing freshly showered, her make-up is fully done, flawlessly. Beatty makes quite a few comments about how crazy it is she is doing all this stuff on camera and how insane the environment is. Madonna clearly loves it and seems to disregard any point he is trying to make. Warren might as well be an inanimate object in Madonna's world. This will be the last we see of him in the film.
One of her dancers appears on a radio show where the host asks her about a tabloid that says Madonna dumped Warren for a dancer - Ollie. She denies the claim but, I guess the audience is to infer the pair did break up, only Madonna is not dating Ollie.
Hands down the most disturbing part of this documentary comes when Madonna is told about her make-up artist Sharon waking up in her hotel with her anus bleeding. She had gone to a club and claims she was not drinking but, clearly she was slipped a roofie or something similar. Madonna's reaction? She laughs. Then she speculates that Sharon must have been telling these guys she met she worked with Madonna and they drugged her and messed with her. Sharon is then seen in the dressing room with the dancers telling them what happened and they express an equal amount of no sympathy. Nobody encourages this woman to go to the police. NOBODY even offers the slightest amount of sympathy or concern for this poor woman. It's appalling and very disturbing.
So while Madonna would like to fancy herself as a mother figure to her dancers and staff, she shows absolutely no inkling of being motherly in this instance. A staff member of hers is drugged and raped and she laughs?
"Oh well," in Madonna's world - the show must go on.
It's hard to watch anything past this point. Madonna is soon back on stage prancing around to the song Holiday and the film just moves along as if nothing happened.
Off to Europe....
Madonna finds herself at odds with the Vatican again. Eventually she cancels some shows because of the animosity.
Sandra Bernhard visits Madonna. Remember her? Ugh. She was famous for about 16 minutes in the late 80's, which was 16 minutes way too long. Madonna tells Sandra she wants to meet Antonio Banderas.
Surprise surprise she meets him and he's married.
The movie begins to wrap up and Madonna is playing the game Truth or Dare with her dancers. She performs a lewd act on a bottle and reveals her true love to be Sean - as in Sean Penn. This is the ONLY scene that is revealing and shows Madonna being sincere. The rest of the movie is really her just trying her best to shock people with her generic, obnoxious humor.
In another scene, Madonna reveals that she's not interested in being a great singer or dancer; she just wants to push people's buttons and be political.
Finally the movie ends with Madonna and her dancers in her bed - completely scripted.
While I did enjoy watching some parts of this film again, it is clear this movie is very different to me watching as an adult.
Now more than ever I realize how truly narcissistic she was. Other people are objects to Madonna. They are to be entertained and should provide entertainment for her, but not to be recognized as having their own feelings and they certainly should not express their feelings to her directly.
On a positive note, Madonna has shown indications in her latest interview that she has indeed grown up in some ways. It's easy to be hard on Madonna and criticize her but it's hard to relate to a person who has been in the public eye for as long as she has been. The woman has literally been worshiped by millions of people across the globe so what can any of us really expect?
What makes her so special? She is right. She's not the best singer; she's never been in an acting role that has amounted to showing any exceptional talent; she's not the greatest dancer. She's mediocre at best. She does manage to keep control over her image and she knows how to manipulate the media and based on this film she definitely knows how to manipulate others around her. She also has a lot of confidence. Maybe we like her because she proves you can be successful and not be the "best." No doubt she does work and she keeps moving forward, no matter what obstacles stand in her way.
Is she a good role model for women? I don't think so. Something tells me that the woman in our country who fought for voting rights and equal treatment were not interested in women taking this power and using it the way Madonna has.
One thing I do like about her is that she never seems to take on the victim-status like so many other celebrities do. She has never found herself in rehab. She is not known for her drug use or alcohol abuse. In fact, she actually seems to take good care of her body and enjoys being healthy.
Love her or hate her, she is an icon in American culture and nothing will change that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)