Just when you think you've heard enough from the democrats, along comes Carville to remind us how we should blame everything on Bush. 5 years of Obama and it's still Bush's fault? Really?
CARVILLE: You know, what I would say and maybe a little bit of a different view here. I think what really is freaking people out is the incompetence of the Bush administration in Iraq.
O'REILLY: You're going to blame Bush?
CARVILLE: Of course, the Iraq thing is why people have so much trepidation about going into Syria. They said the last time we went over there, look what happened. I really think this has something to do with it.
Source
Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Middle East. Show all posts
2013-09-05
2012-09-26
If Obama Knew...
If Obama knew that the attacks were going to happen because our government was warned 48 hours ahead of time and he did NOTHING to increase security...that coupled with the terrorists finding an undisclosed location of the "safe house"...this is TREASON! Is it not? Obviously he put some other interest ahead of the American people. He should be locked up, tried, and then put to sleep.
Labels:
attacks,
Egypt,
government,
Libya,
Middle East,
Obama,
treason,
warning
Posted by
Tuesday
2010-01-07
US Wants Peace In The Middle East - Again
The Obama Administration will take it's stab at trying to get Isreal to negotiate with the Palestinian's. Since, last year, talk efforts hit a dead end.
Click title for the full story being reported on the AP.
"We're going to be even more committed this year, and we're starting this new year with that level of commitment and we're going to follow through and hopefully we can see this as a positive year in this long process," Clinton told reporters after the meeting.
Because, we've never been "more committed" before, right?
According the article, we will be offering our opinions or, "guarantees" in letters concerning the desired outcome.
The letters are likely to contain gestures to both sides. For the Palestinians, that would include criticism of settlements and the belief that the borders that existed before the 1967 Arab-Israeli War be the basis of a future peace deal. For the Israelis, they would acknowledge that post-1967 demographic changes on the ground must be taken into account, meaning that Israel would be able to keep some settlements.
So, basically, if you're attacked and you win the war, you should give up what you won because, it's not fair?!?!
It is unbelievable to me that we even get our noses involved in this. Israel is our ally. We support them, end of story. We are at war with these Muslim extremists, why do we keep forgetting this?
Click title for the full story being reported on the AP.
"We're going to be even more committed this year, and we're starting this new year with that level of commitment and we're going to follow through and hopefully we can see this as a positive year in this long process," Clinton told reporters after the meeting.
Because, we've never been "more committed" before, right?
According the article, we will be offering our opinions or, "guarantees" in letters concerning the desired outcome.
The letters are likely to contain gestures to both sides. For the Palestinians, that would include criticism of settlements and the belief that the borders that existed before the 1967 Arab-Israeli War be the basis of a future peace deal. For the Israelis, they would acknowledge that post-1967 demographic changes on the ground must be taken into account, meaning that Israel would be able to keep some settlements.
So, basically, if you're attacked and you win the war, you should give up what you won because, it's not fair?!?!
It is unbelievable to me that we even get our noses involved in this. Israel is our ally. We support them, end of story. We are at war with these Muslim extremists, why do we keep forgetting this?
Labels:
Israel,
Middle East,
negotiate,
Palestinian's,
Peace,
United States,
US talks
Posted by
Tuesday
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Alternative Conservative
