O'Mara Speaks -- Corrupt Prosecution

Now that the trial is over, everyone is reflecting on the events that eventually led up to the trial. The fact is, this trial should have never occurred. The arrest of Zimmerman should not have occurred.

The prosecution deliberately hid evidence, which was confirmed by Ben Kruidbos who testified that the state was aware of cell phone information back in January. The defense did not become privy to this evidence until June.

Judge Nelson was equally disturbing in her repeated refusal to allow the defense a continuance in order to have time to make sense of the information that was withheld. This is unheard of and prejudicial. Perhaps she knew the state did not have a case to begin with and her actions were merely for show to allow the public to believe she was supporting the prosecution -- just acting out the PC narrative. This doesn't excuse her outrageous behavior but it might explain it.

Angela Corey bypassed a grand jury in order to arrest Zimmerman and prosecute him. Now, how is it we still have people who think this action was justified in anyway? If this had been an action against a black person, these same Zimmerman haters would be screaming from the rooftops about how unfair and corrupt the prosecution was. Yet, in the eyes of Zimmerman haters, this action is welcomed with full approval. In fact, there is an undertone that seems to be telling Americans that blacks should be given extra or special rights. The government should be more lenient towards blacks in general, while simultaneously being hostile towards whites or Hispanics. It is the bigotry found in low expectations that the liberal ideology has created a black culture that feels above the law and now supports government action that reflects racial supremacy.

Without a doubt many blacks have taken great efforts into ignoring this trial, ignoring the facts that were revealed, and have refused to accept that George is actually telling the truth. They identify with Trayvon because he reflects their inner attitude that it does not matter what a black person does; it should be perfectly legal to attack a white person and how dare anyone defend themselves from said attack. They might not admit this outright but the fact is they are still repeating lies and by now many have to realize how wrong they are however, the collective mind and ego that is rooted in hateful emotion refuses to reconcile the facts of this case. If they can just continue to pretend that George is a liar by hanging onto every little word and displaying their hyper-literal thought process than surly they can continue to convince themselves he is guilty.

No reasonable person looking at this case objectively can possibly arrive at the conclusion that George acted in an inappropriate way.

Witnesses in Trayvon Martin Case Coached

The question is now being raised concerning witnesses in the Trayvon Martin case whether there was coaching involved by the prosecution. It seems four witnesses have changed or evolved their stories in such a way that their initial stories supporting Zimmerman, now seem weakened.

I know that one witness had initially said Zimmerman was certainly on the bottom of the altercation she saw but, then changed her mind after seeing the news and was convinced that the bigger man, Zimmerman was on top. If we look at the time of this change, we see that the news was inaccurately reporting both Zimmerman's and Trayvon's size. We now know that Trayvon was larger.

Witness 1
Original story: Witness saw two persons scuffle but didn't know "which one" was on top of the other during the scuffle. 

New story: Witness says she is sure it was Zimmerman on top. 

Witness 2
Original story: Witness spotted Zimmerman with "blood on the back of his head." Zimmerman told this witness that Martin "was beating up on me, so I had to shoot him." 

New story: Witness describes Zimmerman's demeanor as nonchalant, "More like, 'just tell my wife I shot somebody' like it was nothing." 

Witness 3
Original story: "I saw two guys running. Couldn't tell you who was in front, who was behind." After stepping away from her window, she looked again and "saw a fistfight. Just fists. I don't know who was hitting who." In a second interview by police, she stated that during the chase, the two figures were 10 feet apart. 

New story: She did not see two people running, just one person, whom she heard more than saw. "I couldn't tell you if it was a man, a woman, a kid, black or white. I couldn't tell you because it was dark and because I didn't have my contacts on or glasses. I just know I saw a person out there." 

Witness 4
Original story: Witness states that on the night of the shooting that Martin was on top, "just throwing down blows on the guy, MMA-style." Witness also recalled that Zimmerman was calling for help. 

New story: Witness tells prosecution he isn't sure who was calling for help.

Obviously witnesses are known to question themselves and it is common to find some additional details that could not be recalled before but, all four of these particular witnesses altering their stories in such a way that just so happens to weaken the defense?

Personally, I think this prosecutor is nasty and out for political power. She wants to go after Zimmerman for a career booster. There is, nor has there ever been, a desire for justice. Railroading someone and taking away their rights when no evidence of their guilt is found is anything but justice.

Click here for more.